demonstrated that Luke used a wide variety of correspondences and constituents to these correspondences. Our evaluation will confirm this. Second, he reveals Luke’s strong predisposition to interconnect passages in various ways and often with fine detail. This is evident within Luke and between Luke and Acts.4 Third, he investigates the functions and purposes of Lukan previews, reviews, echoes, parallels and type-scenes. Tannehill shows concern for the interpretative impact of correlations, the effect
Page 3